[acb-diabetics] The Prodigy Voice Vs. the Solo
Mike Freeman
k7uij at panix.com
Thu Aug 11 14:15:35 EDT 2011
Accuracy is a relative term at best and undefined at worse. There *no* low-cost meters that meet lab standards. I've gotten bum readings with both Solo and Prodigy.
Mike Freeman
sent from my iPhone
On Aug 11, 2011, at 9:45, "Patricia LaFrance-Wolf" <plawolf at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Cording to Chris Gray, the Solo is more accurate. I have not gotten any
> strips for it as my strips for the Prodigy just came in and I have 3 months
> worth.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: acb-diabetics-bounces at acb.org [mailto:acb-diabetics-bounces at acb.org]
> On Behalf Of Nancy Ungar
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:46 PM
> To: acb-diabetics at acb.org
> Subject: [acb-diabetics] The Prodigy Voice Vs. the Solo
>
> Hi. A friend of mine asked me which of the 2 meters is more
> accurate. She's thinking of getting either one of these meters.
> I have both of them, but I haven't used the Solo meter yet, would
> you believe? Which meter gets the most votes and why? This might
> help me use the Solo. Thanks. Nancy Ungar
> _______________________________________________
> acb-diabetics mailing list
> acb-diabetics at acb.org
> http://www.acb.org/mailman/listinfo/acb-diabetics
>
> _______________________________________________
> acb-diabetics mailing list
> acb-diabetics at acb.org
> http://www.acb.org/mailman/listinfo/acb-diabetics
More information about the acb-diabetics
mailing list