[acb-hsp] The relationship between attachment, psycholopathology and childhood disability
J.Rayl
thedogmom63 at frontier.com
Tue Nov 13 13:19:24 EST 2012
The relationship between attachment, psychopathology, and childhood disability.
Author: Huebner, Ruth A. 1 ; Thomas, Kenneth R. 1 U Wisconsin, Dept of Rehabilitation
Psychology, Madison, US
Publication info: Rehabilitation Psychology 40. 2 (1995): 111-124.
https://login.libproxy.edmc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/614319132?accountid=34899
Abstract: Analyzes the literature on 3 aspects of attachment-neurobiological influences,
interpersonal and intrapersonal factors, and societal factors-in the psychological
development of chronically disabled children. Evidence suggests that neurochemical
substances such as cortisol and brain biogenic amine systems reciprocally interact
with psychological and psychosocial factors to influence attachment. Interpersonal
and intrapersonal factors such as temperamental characteristics of children, severity
and type of disability, and family influences interact in the process of attachment.
Social perceptions and prejudices about the disabled individual increase parental
stress, and diminish parental involvement and resources, which are necessary for
attachment. These 3 processes are powerful and interrelated forces in child development,
with potential to modify social competence, neurological development, and psychosocial
adjustment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Links: null
Full Text: Contents - Abstract
ATTACHMENTTHEORY
NEUROBIOLOGICAL INFLUENCES AND CONSEQUENCES Cortisol
Biogenic Amine Systems
NEUROBIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES
INTERPERSONAL AND INTRAPERSONAL FACTORS Temperamental Characteristics of Children
Disability Characteristics
Within Family Influences on Attachment
SOCIAL FACTORS
IMPLICATIONS
Show less Abstract The literature concerning three aspects of attachment (neurobiological
influences, interpersonal and intrapersonal factors, and societal factors) in the
psychological development of children with chronic disease and disability is reviewed.
The literature suggests that these three attachment processes are reciprocally interactive,
complicated by aspects of childhood disability, and potentially related to the development
of emotional maladjustment. An understanding of attachment processes may have important
implications for facilitating adjustment in the young child and ameliorating psychopathology
in the adolescent and adult with a disability.
Historically, the study of childhood psychological dysfunction has been complicated
by inadequate diagnostic criteria for children and an insufficient understanding
of psychological development between infancy and adulthood ( Kazdin, 1988 , 1993
). Determining the relationship between chronic physical disorders in children and
the subsequent risk for psychopathology is additionally hampered by multiple methodological
problems in defining and measuring these two constructs ( Breslau, 1985 ; Pless &
Nolan, 1991 ). Pless and Nolan (1991) summarized the literature in this area and
concluded that nearly 10% of children have some form of chronic physical illness
with twice the risk of psychopathology. Other authors ( Breslau, 1985 ; Cadman, Boyle,
Szatmari, & Offord, 1987 ; Rutter, 1981 ; Seidel, Chadwick, & Rutter, 1975 ) concluded
that the risk of psychopathology increases threefold for children with a physical
disability, and fourfold in children who have a brain injury. An overall elevation
in emotional or behavioral difficulties is typically described in studies on children
with chronic disease and disabilities, without delineation or specific diagnostic
criteria ( Breslau, 1985 ). In one attempt to delineate emotional disorders, Cadman
and his colleagues (1987) randomly sampled 1,869 families, including the children
and their teachers, and found an overall increase in neurotic disorders, attentional
disorders, conduct disorders, social maladjustment, and multiple psychiatric disorders
among children with chronic diseases or disabilities; however, there was no preponderance
of any specific emotional disorder.
Finding evidence of increased psychopathology is, of course, an easier task than
explaining why that pathology may exist. Kazdin (1993) noted that psychological research
has neglected children with chronic diseases and physical handicaps; he argued for
exploring both risk and protective factors to understand childhood psychological
dysfunction and treatment. Attachment processes may be such a risk or protective
factor. Securely attached children are more likely to achieve social competence,
trust, a strong sense of self, and resilience against stress; in contrast, insecurely
attached children are more likely to develop psychopathology (e.g., see Ainsworth,
1978 ; Cox & Lambrenos, 1992 ).
Attachment is variously defined by authors from different perspectives as mother-infant
interaction patterns ( Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978 ), as mother-infant
interaction patterns with related neurobiological system development ( Bowlby, 1969
), and/or as a socialization process ( Kraemer, 1992 ). The purpose of this paper
is to elucidate the relationships among these three components of attachment: (a)
neurobiological influences and consequences, (b) interpersonal and intrapersonal
factors, and (c) social forces affecting the child and caregiver. The literature
search and review included publications on attachment in typical and atypical development,
and publications on childhood chronic illness or congenital disability. Disorders
such as asthma, cleft palate, cerebral palsy, and congenital anomalies are typically
mentioned in the literature, usually without differentiation. Other authors (e.g.,
see Kraemer, 1992 ; Wasserman & Allen, 1985 ) have elaborated on the relationship
between neurological development and attachment, but no author has specifically integrated
the literature on attachment as described in this paper.
ATTACHMENTTHEORY Classic attachment theory emphasizes the intrapersonal drive for
social relatedness and the interpersonal relationships necessary to satisfy that
drive. Attachment and loss theory grew out of a psychoanalytic framework with an
emphasis on object relations; it is based on the work of John Bowlby (1973 , 1979
, 1982) , who argued that the mother-infant relationship was fundamental to emotional
stability rather than mere physical survival. Ainsworth and her associates ( Ainsworth,
1978 , 1985 ; Ainsworth & Bell, 1970 ; Ainsworth et al., 1978 ) developed a widely
used system of classifying attachment behavior into three groups: avoidant/insecurely
attached (Group A), securely attached (Group B), and ambivalent/insecurely attached
(Group C). Although the names of Bowlby and Ainsworth are often considered synonymous
with attachment theory, other psychoanalytic scholars have also contributed significantly
to an understanding of attachment (e.g., Eagle, 1984 ; Fairbairn, 1952 ; Greenberg
& Mitchell, 1983 ; Mahler, 1968 ; Mahler, Pine, & Bergman, 1975 ; Sullivan, 1953
; Winnicott, 1960 ) with the common belief that attachment is fundamental to emotional
health and social relationships.
Recently, authors such as Baldwin (1992) , Liotti (1984) , Safran and Segal (1990)
, and Westen (1991) have formalized a link between attachment and interpersonal theory
and cognitive therapy. According to these authors, fundamental interpersonal schema
with expectations and rules for maintaining interpersonal relatedness are formed
in early attachment relationships. For example, complex social schema with a hierarchy
of representations are found in children at age three ( Bretherton, 1985 ).
NEUROBIOLOGICAL INFLUENCES AND CONSEQUENCES The strong link between brain injury
and psychopathology suggests that one component in the development of psychopathology
is altered brain function. However, the literature indicates that neurobiological
mechanisms are reciprocally interactive. That is, failures in infant and child attachment
may compromise neurobiological development and consequently psychological well-being.
Moreover, neurobiological differences may exist as a direct result of brain dysfunction,
which may affect relatedness directly with subsequent secondary social deficits.
Although it is not clear which specific neurobiological deficits result from inadequate
attachment or interfere with normal attachment and social interaction, research is
beginning to illuminate these relationships. For example, deficits in neurotransmission
processes and neurochemicals, abnormalities in neural responses, and site-specific
neurological lesions are being identified in people with severe developmental disorders
such as autistic disorder and mental retardation (e.g., see Hooper, Boyd, Hynd, &
Rubin, 1993 ; Huebner, 1992 , for reviews of this literature), but neither the etiology
nor the developmental implications of these neurological alterations has been established.
Several neurochemical substances which relate to issues of attachment have also been
studied in human and nonhuman primate research. These substances are cortisol and
the brain biogenic amine systems, including the norepinephrine (NE) system, dopamine
(DA) system, and serotonin (5HT) system.
Cortisol Stress has been shown to be associated with alterations in the immune system,
sleep cycle, circadian rhythms, and possibly some aspects of learning ( Reite, 1990
). Consequently, children with disabilities who are subjected to increased stress
due to medical procedures, separation from mothers, and other complications such
as cardiopulmonary insufficiency are more likely to suffer stress-related secondary
disabilities.
Cortisol is the primary hormone produced by the adrenocortical system in humans;
it increases the level of energy available to respond to stress, suppresses inflammation,
and facilitates learning ( Gunnar, 1989 ). Too much cortisol secretion may be associated
with being overwhelmed by stress, especially novel stress. Since cortisol levels
can be measured by tests on saliva, the research in this area is growing, but the
findings are preliminary. Gunnar, in several studies, discovered that both behavioral
distress and sleeping were associated with excessive elevation of cortisol levels
during medical procedures such as circumcision, suggesting that observation alone
is insufficient to measure stress in an infant. According to Gunnar, experience with
a stressful event tended to attenuate cortisol secretion, but infants showed substantial
variability in their responses to stress. Similarly, Fox (1989) found that infants'
and young children's responses to stress fell on two continua of reactivity or arousal
and the ability to regulate autonomic nervous system responses. For example, children
with high reactivity and high regulation were expressive and social, but those with
high reactivity and low regulation were more hyperactive and uncontrollable. These
highly reactive infants with low regulation of autonomic nervous system responses
were more vulnerable to stress.
>From another perspective, Coe, Lubach, and Ershler (1989) found in numerous related
studies that psychological distress (in non-human primates) can alter the immune
system with potentially long-lasting effects on susceptibility to illness. Conversely,
touch, when given by a individual with an attached relationship to the child, may
reduce the biological disorders that occur secondary to stress and separation ( Reite,
1990 ). Although preliminary, these research findings may facilitate more precise
identification of children who manifest signs of being overwhelmed by stress.
Biogenic Amine Systems A great deal of research on the neurobiological aspects of
attachment has grown from the work of Harry Harlow with non-human primates. Kraemer,
Ebert, Schmidt, and McKinney (1989) reared infant monkeys from birth in several attachment
conditions (i.e., without any objects; with cloth, stationary wire, or moving wire
surrogate mothers; with peers; or with their mothers). They measured the levels of
NE over 21 months. Although monkeys raised with peers had higher levels of NE than
those raised without objects or with inanimate surrogate mothers, the monkeys raised
by their mothers had nearly twice the levels of NE. Low levels of NE are thought
to be associated with poor overall adaptation, attention disorders, increased vulnerability
to stress, and decreased problem-solving ability. In addition, primates raised in
social isolation were noted to have eating disorders; lack aggression-impulse control;
and demonstrate hypervigilance, body rocking, self-injurious behavior, and a variety
of cognitive deficits. Kraemer (1992) integrated the results of many studies on brain
biogenic amine systems and concluded that deficits produced by isolation include
disregulation of all three biogenic amine systems (NE, DA, and 5HT), changes in brain
cytoarchitecture such as reduction in dendritic branching, and failure to organize
an emotional response to stressors.
NEUROBIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES Perhaps in no other disorder is the link between neurobiology
and attachment as intriguing as in autistic disorder. Sigman and Mundy (1988) defined
a continuum of attachment behaviors in children with autistic disorder and found
that these children were attached to their parents, but were more vulnerable to separation
from parents than other children. The autistic children's social deficits were related
to difficulty with comprehending and sharing emotional reactions rather than to lack
of responsiveness. One possible explanation for these findings may be that the neuromechanisms
for attachment are altered prior to birth in children with autistic disorder; consequently,
the social contacts of parents may be ineffective in developing social responsiveness,
with a resulting cascade of impairment in many systems as described in the work of
Kraemer et al. (1989) and Kraemer (1992) .
The evidence linking increased physical or cognitive disability as secondary to disruption
of attachment is sparse, but this potential relationship is an important consideration
when examining the effects of interrupted attachment. Magid and McKelvey (1987) described
the worst-case scenario for children with attachment disorders as including some
sensory abnormalities with decreased ability to feel pain or affectionate touch,
phoniness, learning disabilities, abnormalities in eye contact, speech pathology,
and many other severe psychopathic behaviors. Similarly, Steinhauer (1991) discussed
children with disorganized and disoriented attachment (Group D Attachment response)
as exhibiting whining, petulant behavior, huddling, rocking, and wetting in response
to stress. Some of these insecure attachment-related behaviors could be perceived
as intensifying existing symptoms of physical disabilities or in some cases mimicking
a physical disorder.
Attachment may also influence intellectual and motor development. Wasserman and Allen
(1985) studied 12 children with disabilities compared to 14 "at-risk" premature children
and 9 normal children at 9, 12, 18, and 24 months; they found that children who were
ignored at 12 months (50% of those with a disability; none of the normal sample)
showed a 30-point drop in IQ by 24 months as measured on a variety of developmental
scales. Sorting out the cause of this diminished IQ is difficult since IQ tends to
be unstable in young children, and lower cognitive levels could be associated with
diminished social reciprocity and maternal fatigue over time. However, Egeland and
Farber (1984) studied over 200 mother/infant dyads and also found that those children
with more anxious resistant attachment had significantly lower scores on both the
mental and motor sections of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 9 months.
Psychopathology, possibly stemming from insecure attachment, may also be associated
with increased vulnerability to the onset of physical disabilities. Rutter (1981)
, for example, found in a follow-up study after head trauma that children with mild
head injuries ( n = 29) were more impulsive, disturbed, and overactive before their
head injury than a control group, suggesting that behavioral disturbances may increase
vulnerability to head trauma.
INTERPERSONAL AND INTRAPERSONAL FACTORS To understand the context of attachment for
children with disabilities, it is necessary to examine both infant characteristics
and caregiver responses because it is within this context that interpersonal and
intrapersonal characteristics interact in the process of attachment. When considering
the influence of infant and child characteristics, researchers view the child as
an active participant in the social relationship with caregivers; that is, the child
both influences and is influenced by the interaction (e.g., see Rogers, 1988 ).
Temperamental Characteristics of Children Overall, children with disabilities are
more likely to be born prematurely with low birthweight ( Cox & Lambrenos, 1992 ),
and they may require long-term hospitalization. Plunkett, Meisels, Stiefel, Pasick,
and Roloff (1986) compared 33 premature infants, at ages 12 and 18 months, who required
hospitalization for more than one month to preterm infants who were hospitalized
for less than one month. Although 55% of the long-term hospitalized infants were
judged to be securely attached, 36% (compared to 9% of infants with shorter hospital
stays) were found to exhibit patterns of insecurity with anxious and resistant behaviors.
This study was particularly significant since the authors excluded infants who showed
signs of central nervous system disorders, or whose mothers were addicted to drugs
or alcohol, were less than 17 at the time of birth, or who had severe mental disorders.
Thus, the sample of premature infants was likely to be showing the effects of long-term
separation after birth rather than increased biological vulnerability to attachment
disorders.
Premature babies are also likely to be more irritable and immature ( Cox & Lambrenos,
1992 ). Crockenberg (1981) found that irritable and unresponsive babies, those with
motor immaturity, or babies with poor physiological regulation were more stressful
to mothers and more vulnerable to other maternal or family stressors; conversely,
easy temperament babies were more likely to develop secure attachments even in discordant
homes.
By three weeks of age, mothers and infants have established a cycle of rhythmic interaction
in which the mother and child match levels of vocalization and cuddling ( Brooks-Gunn
& Luciano, 1985 ); responsive infants who vocalize and cuddle elicit the same level
of interaction from their caregivers. Between 9 and 12 weeks, a typical child develops
the ability to change head position and visual gaze, smile, and vocalize ( van Wulfften
Palthe & Hopkins, 1993 ). Van Wulfften Palthe and Hopkins theorized that these typical
abilities enable a child's first control of and competence in social interactions.
Premature or disabled children may have poor ability to interact and focus attention,
with decreased visual tracking and reaching, and impaired sensory responses and ability
to cuddle ( Bendell, 1984 ). Infants (2-7 months) with a physical disability made
less eye contact and fewer protests toward the mother when compared with typical
infants ( Barrera & Vella, 1987 ). Consequently, children with disabilities may be
less able to steady their head, focus their gaze, smile, and vocalize in response
to others; these limited social abilities may elicit less reciprocal interaction
by the mother ( Rogers, 1988 ), and afford a diminished experience of social competence
and control for the child.
Disability Characteristics Although the evidence is not conclusive, severity of disability
tends to have a concave, curvilinear relationship with psychological adjustment (
Breslau, 1985 ). That is, individuals with mild or severe disabilities tend to present
more psychopathology ( Pless & Nolan, 1991 ). However, the reasons for psychopathology
may be different in the mild and severe groups. Children with severe disabilities
are more likely to have brain injury and difficulties with cognition and mentatation
that may mimic psychopathology ( Breslau, 1985 ). Children who have hidden or mild
handicaps, on the other hand, may have an ambiguous identity or difficulty in acknowledgment
of limitations with subsequent maladjustment ( Pless & Nolan, 1991 ).
The type of disability also seems to make a difference in both security of attachment
and overall psychological well being. Children with facial deformities ( Wasserman
& Allen, 1985 ), abnormal genitalia, or sensory abnormalities ( Collins-Moore, 1984
) are more likely to be ignored by their mothers.
Although infants' interactions have been studied extensively, the process of lifespan
adaptation to disability has received less attention ( Eisner, 1990 ). However, Breslau
(1985) studied 304 children (ages 3-18 years) grouped into four congenital conditions
and found that chronicity, with or without neurological injury, was consistently
associated with increased amounts of social isolation, conflicts with parents, and
repressive anxiety.
Within Family Influences on Attachment For parents who have a child with a disability,
the celebration of birth may be replaced with shock, disbelief, and grief. The family
is faced with the high cost of treatment, questions regarding the future, separations
from the infant, and sometimes even decisions about rights to life and death ( Bendell,
1984 ). Some parents disengage from their infant in anticipation of a death ( Plunkett
et al., 1986 ). Although little is actually known about parent-coping processes,
some parental responses may include shock and protective denial, hope for a cure,
grieving for the child with vastly different mourning reactions, grieving for themselves
and their other existing or planned children, feelings of inadequacy, anger towards
many others, and depression ( Eisner, 1990 ). These emotions may divert energy from
the attachment process and require professional intervention.
Adjustment to having a child with a disability is a dynamic process which changes
over time. Barrera and Vella (1987) found that mothers of infants (2-7 months) with
disabilities were very similar to controls in responsiveness to their infants; however,
these mothers were significantly more commanding and controlling during social interactions
with their infants. Over time, the interactional differences may increase; Wasserman
and Allen (1985) , for example, found low rates of maternal ignoring before 18 months,
but by two years of age 50% of mothers with handicapped toddlers ignored their child,
even when being watched by research teams. Long-term ignoring may be associated with
differences in perception, with mothers being less able to judge and respond to the
stress experienced by their children. Tackett, Kerr, and Helmstadter (1990) found
in their study of 20 mother/child dyads (8-15-year-old children with physical disabilities
and average intelligence) that mothers and their children differed in perceptions
of stress and acceptance of the disability. Although the children were keenly aware
of stressors such as school, medical procedures, family strife, and peer reactions,
the mothers were more stressed about the physical limitations and their own feelings
of being different and inadequate. Similarly, Gilbride (1993) found that parents
who perceived their child's disability as more severe, whether this was objectively
true, held lower expectations and gave less encouragement to their child with a disability.
As children move into late adolescence and adulthood, Crittenden (1990) proposed,
but did not investigate, the hypothesis that autonomy will be facilitated by family
cohesion and adaptability, which are marked by open communication, support, and the
emerging of adult attachment styles.
Several authors ( Eisner, 1990 ; Pless & Nolan, 1991 ; Rutter, 1981 ; Seidel et al.,
1975 ) have postulated that a physical disability may create increased vulnerability
to psychopathology, but that vulnerability is exacerbated and manifested when paired
with family dysfunction. Although a causal or directional relationship was not implied,
Rutter (1981) found that the rate of psychiatric disorder in children was 20-25%
in families with adversity, such as marital discord or parental psychopathology,
but less than 7% in families without such adversity.
Lastly, families and their children with chronic disease or physical disabilities
are often separated for medical procedures. Steinhauer (1991) reviewed the effects
of separation and found that children were most susceptible if separation occurred
between the ages of 6 months and 4 years; the longer the separation the greater the
negative impact. Separation anxiety and suffering was attenuated in those children
who were securely attached prior to separation, in those with some prior experience
with separation, and when the post-separation environment supported a process of
mourning and provided tender support.
SOCIAL FACTORS Social forces may present both additional risks for psychopathology
and/or provide a buffer and support for children with disabilities and their families.
The act of labeling a disability is itself fraught with problems since accurate diagnosis
and identification of risks and problems are necessary for intervention, but the
labels may become part of a self-fulfilling prophecy ( Pless & Nolan, 1991 ). People
with chronic diseases or disabilities may be perceived as "damaged goods" ( Phillips,
1990 ) or categorized as devalued people ( Wolfensberger & Tullman, 1991 ). Regrettably,
professionals may unwittingly reinforce or act upon limited or stereotyped expectations
and facilitate the process of stigmatization ( Rubenfeld, 1988 ; Sigelman, 1991 ).
Parents are sometimes characterized as overprotective, shopping for treatments, depressed,
hostile, overcompensating, and poorly adjusted to their child's disability ( MacKinnon
& Marlett, 1984 ).
Both parents and their children with disabilities are vulnerable to prejudice secondary
to these stereotypical beliefs. These social pressures are likely to create parental
stress and diminish parental resources necessary for nurturance and attachment (
Westman, 1991 ).
Although mothers may feel the most pressure, Tavecchio and van IJzendoorn (1987)
challenged the belief that mothers must bear the burden and guilt. These authors
proposed that a stable network of caregivers may be optimal to reduce maternal stress
and minimize the effects of neglect or overprotection of a child. In support of this
proposal, they studied 166 families and found that 70% of the children with working
mothers (as compared to nonworking mothers) exhibited equal attachment intensity
with both the mother and father.
IMPLICATIONS When considering this literature on attachment, it is evident that the
three fundamental components of attachment processes are powerful and interrelated
forces in child development, with potential to modify social competence, neurological
development, and psychological adjustment. An appreciation of the dynamics of attachment
has important implications for treatment and research.
When assessing a child and his or her family, psychologists must recognize that neurological
disorders, developmental delays, or psychopathology have potential to be exacerbated
by inadequate attachment to caregivers. Furthermore, a developmental or emotional
disorder may be a secondary problem that is founded in inadequate attachment. Although
such disorders or delays will alter the interpersonal interaction between the child
and the caregivers, a securely attached child will have an innate buffer against
psychopathology. In view of these findings, psychologists and other professionals
must consider the impact on attachment when intervening within a family. For example,
parents are often asked to provide medical, educational, or therapeutic interventions
for their child at home. These interventions, although potentially beneficial, may
create guilt and stress for the caregivers and ultimately interfere with the benefits
of the attachment process. It may be more important, in some cases, to facilitate
the bond between child and caregivers than to treat the child. Rogers (1988) , for
instance, suggested helping caregivers to recognize and interpret the altered or
subtle social behavior of the infant and Westman (1991) recommended assessing and
facilitating a family's capability to form a parent-professional alliance.
Adults with lifelong chronic diseases or congenital disabilities are likely to have
experienced alterations in attachment interactions with their caregivers and continue
to have an increased risk of psychopathology. For example, Turner and McLean (1989)
found that rates of depression and anxiety were two and a half to four times higher
in adults with disabilities ( n = 967). Although Turner and McLean attributed this
psychopathology to chronic stress, another variable might be alterations in interpersonal
expectations and images stemming from alterations in interpersonal relatedness. Safran
and Segal (1990) suggested that interpersonal expectations often become self-fulfilling
prophecies in which the individual both construes reality and constructs reality
to validate the expectations. While finding employment and securing social support
are important for combating depression in adults, examining interpersonal schema
and the meaning of ambiguous attachment may enhance social competence and mastery
for the adult with a disability. Safran and Segal (1990) provided a guide for such
intervention which included using interpersonal processes to activate and explore
implicit interpersonal schema and cognitive therapy to alter these schema.
Finally, there is a critical need for research to clarify: (a) the coping processes
of families and ways to identify families who are most in need of intervention, and
(b) the dynamics of adjustment to disability across childhood and into adulthood.
A pertinent question is: If attachment processes are fundamental to mental health,
then how are attachment deficits manifested in adults and adolescents with physical
disabilities?
REFERENCES
1 . Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1978). Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
2 . Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1985). Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.
3 . Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. (1970). Child Development.
4 . Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of
attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5 . Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Psychological Bulletin.
6 . Barrera, M. E., & Vella, D. M. (1987). American Journal of Occupational Therapy.
7 . Bendell, R. D., Eisenberg, M. G., Sutkin, L. C., & Jansen, M. A. (1984). Chronic
illness and disability through the life span: Effects on self and family. New York:
Springer.
8 . Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1: Attachment. London: Hogarth Press.
9 . Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2: Separation. New York: Basic Books.
10 . Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectual bonds. London: Tavistock.
11 . Bowlby, J. (1980). Loss: Sadness and depression. London: Hogarth Press.
12 . Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic
Books.
13 . Breslau, N. (1985). Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry.
14 . Bretherton, I., Bretherton, I., & Waters, E. (1985). Growing points of attachment
theory and research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
15 . Brooks-Gunn, J., Luciano, L., & Sigman, M. (1985). Children with emotional disorders
and developmental disabilities: Assessment and treatment. New York: Grune and Stratton.
16 . Cadman, D., Boyle, M., Szatmari, P., & Offord, D. R. (1987). Pediatrics.
17 . Coe, C. L., Lubach, G., Ershler, W. B., Lewis, M., & Worobey, J. (1989). Infant
stress and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
18 . Collins-Moore, M. S., Eisenberg, M. G., Sutkin, L. C., & Jansen, M. A. (1984).
Chronic illness and disability through the life span: Effects on self and family.
New York: Springer.
19 . Cox, A. D., & Lambrenos, K. (1992). Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology.
20 . Crittenden, P. M. (1990). Child Health Care.
21 . Crockenberg, S. B. (1981). Child Development.
22 . Eagle, M. N. (1984). Recent developments in psychoanalysis: A critical evaluation.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
23 . Eisner, C. (1990). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
24 . Egeland, B., & Farber, E. A. (1984). Child Development.
25 . Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). An object-relations theory of the personality. New
York: Basic Books.
26 . Fox, N. A., Lewis, M., & Worobey, J. (1989). Infant stress and coping. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass Inc.
27 . Gilbride, D. D. (1993). Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin.
28 . Greenberg, J. R., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic
theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29 . Gunnar, M. R., Lewis, M., & Worobey, J. (1989). Infant stress and coping. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
30 . Hooper, S. R., Boyd, T. A., Hynd, G. W., & Rubin, J. (1993). Archives of Clinical
Neuropsychology.
31 . Huebner, R. A. (1992). American Journal of Occupational Therapy.
32 . Kazdin, A. E. (1988). Child psychotherapy: Developing and identifying effective
treatments. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
33 . Kazdin, A. E. (1993). American Psychologist.
34 . Kraemer, G. W. (1992). Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
35 . Kraemer, G. W., Ebert, M. H., Schmidt, D. E., & McKinney, W. T. (1989). Neuropsychopharmacology.
36 . Liotti, G., Reda, M. A., & Mahoney, M. J. (1984). Cognitive psychotherapies
recent development in theory, research, and practice. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
37 . MacKinnon, L., Marlett, N., & Hansen, J. C. (1984). Families with handicapped
members. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
38 . Mahler, M. S. (1968). On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation:
Vol. 1: Infantile psychosis. New York: International Universities Press.
39 . Mahler, M. A., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the
human infant: Symbiosis and individuation. New York: Basic Books.
40 . Magid, K., & McKelvey, C. A. (1987). High risk: Children without a conscience.
New York: Bantam.
41 . Phillips, M. (1990). Social Sciences in Medicine.
42 . Pless, B., & Nolan, T. (1991). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
43 . Plunkett, J. W., Meisels, S. J., Stiefel, G. S., Pasick, P. L., & Roloff, D.
W. (1986). Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry.
44 . Reite, M. (1990). Advances in touch: New implications in human development.
New Brunswick, NJ: Johnson and Johnson Products.
45 . Rogers, S. J. (1988). Child: Care, Health, and Development.
46 . Rubenfeld, P., Rubin, S. E., & Rubin, N. M. (1988). Contemporary challenges
to the rehabilitation counseling professional. Baltimore: Brooks.
47 . Rutter, M. (1981). The American Journal of Psychiatry.
48 . Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal processes in cognitive therapy.
New York: Basic.
49 . Seidel, U. P., Chadwick, O. F. D., & Rutter, M. (1975). Developmental Medicine
and Child Neurology.
50 . Sigelman, C. K. (1991). Rehabilitation Psychology.
51 . Sigman, M., & Mundy, P. (1989). Journal of the American Academy of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry.
52 . Steinhauer, P. D., & Steinhauer, P. D. (1991). The least detrimental alternative.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
53 . Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
54 . Tackett, P., Kerr, N., & Helmstadter, G. (1990). Journal of Rehabilitation.
55 . Tavecchio, L. W. C., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Tavecchio, L. W. C., & van IJzendoorn,
M. H. (1987). Attachment in social networks: Contributions to the Bowlby-Ainsworth
attachment theory. New York: North-Holland.
56 . Turner, J. R., & McLean, P. D. (1989). Rehabilitation Psychology.
57 . van Wulfften Palthe, T., & Hopkins, B. (1993). Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry.
58 . Wasserman, G. A., & Allen, R. (1985). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
59 . Westen, D. (1991). Psychological Bulletin.
60 . Westman, J. C. (1991). Who speaks for the children?. Sarasota, FL: Professional
Resources Exchange.
61 . Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. New York:
International Universities Press.
62 . Wolfensberger, W., Tullman, S., Eisenberg, M. G., & Glueckauf, R. L. (1991).
Empirical approaches to the psychosocial aspects of disability. New York: Springer.
Show less
Address for Correspondence: Ruth A. Huebner, Department of Rehabilitation Psychology,
University of Wisconsin, 432 N. Murray Street, Madison, WI 53706
© 1995 Division of Rehabilitation Psychology of the American Psychological Association
Subject: Attachment Behavior (major); Chronic Illness (major); Literature Review
(major); Psychological Development (major); Disorders; Interpersonal Influences;
Neurobiology; Social Influences
Classification: 3200: Psychological&Physical Disorders
Age: Childhood (birth-12 yrs)
Population: Human
Identifier (keyword): neurobiological&interpersonal&intrapersonal&societal factors
of attachment, psychological development, children with chronic disabilities, literature
review
Methodology: Literature Review
Title: The relationship between attachment, psychopathology, and childhood disability.
Publication title: Rehabilitation Psychology
Volume: 40
Issue: 2
Pages: 111-124
Publication date: 1995
Format covered: Print
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Country of publication: United States
ISSN: 0090-5550
eISSN: 1939-1544
Peer reviewed: Yes
Document type: Journal, Journal Article, Peer Reviewed Journal
Number of references: 62
DOI: <a href="
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.40.2.111">http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.40.2.111</a
>
Release date: 01 Aug 1996 (PsycINFO); ; 10 Jul 2006 (PsycARTICLES);
Correction date: 08 Mar 2010 (PsycINFO)
Accession number: 1996-22968-001
ProQuest document ID: 614319132
Document URL:
https://login.libproxy.edmc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/614319132?accountid=34899
Copyright: ©Division of Rehabilitation Psychology of the American Psychological Association
1995
Database: PsycARTICLES
____________________________________________________________
Contact us at:
http://www.proquest.com/go/contactsupport
Copyright © 2012 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved.
Terms and Conditions:
http://search.proquest.com/info/termsAndConditions
Jessie Rayl
thedogmom63 at frontier.com
www.facebook.com/Eaglewings10
www.pathtogrowth.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.acb.org/pipermail/acb-hsp/attachments/20121113/cf1f200e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the acb-hsp
mailing list