[acb-hsp] New Sensitivity Gene Discovered
peter altschul
paltschul at centurytel.net
Thu Jan 24 17:39:25 EST 2013
New Sensitivity Gene Discovered
Scott Barry Kaufman, Ph.D. January 23,
In Psychiatry, there has been a great mystery. We know that
virtually every single mental disorder identified thus far has a
heritable basis. So we know that many genes are involved. At
the same time, whenever we go fishing for the specific genes that
are associated with any disorder, we end up with an awful lot of
seaweed. Each gene explains only a fraction of the outcome, and
very few genes actually replicate. This doesn't mean genes don't
contribute to the manifestation of psychological traits and
disorders, but it does mean we'll have to look beyond the genetic
level if we want a fuller understanding of how we become who we
are.
In recent years, studies keep accumulating that show the
importance of gene by environment interactions. But researchers
aren't just finding that the environment matters in determining
whether mental illness exists. What is being discovered is far
more interesting and nuanced: Some of the very same genes that
under certain environmental conditions are associated with some
of the lowest lows of humanity, under supportive conditions are
associated with the highest highs of human flourishing.
Referred to by some scientists as the "differential
susceptibility hypothesis" or journalist David Dobbs as "The
Orchid Hypothesis", these findings shouldn't be understated.
They are revolutionary, and suggest a serious rethinking of the
role of genes in the manifestation of our psychological traits
and mental "illness". Instead of all of our genes coding for
particular psychological traits, it appears we have a variety of
genetic mutations that are associated with sensitivity to the
environment-- for better and worse.
Only a few genetic mutations have been discovered so far that
demonstrate differential susceptibility effects. Most of the
genes that have been discovered contribute to the production of
the neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin. Both of these
biological systems contribute heavily to many aspects of
humanity, including our cognitive exploration, engagement with
the world, positive emotions, anxiety, depression, and mood
fluctuations. So far, the evidence suggests (but is still
tentative) that certain genetic variants under harsh and abusive
conditions are associated with anxiety and depression, but that
the very same genetic variants are associated with the lowest
levels of anxiety, depression, and fear under supportive,
nurturing conditions. There hasn't been too much research
looking at differential susceptibility effects on other systems
that involve learning and exploration, however. Enter a brand
new study.
Rising superstar Rachael Grazioplene and colleagues focused on
the cholinergic system-- a biological system crucially involved
in neural plasticity and learning. Situations that activate the
cholinergic system involve "expected uncertainty" such as going
to a new country you've never been before and knowing that you're
going to face things you've never faced before. This stands in
contrast to "unexpected uncertainty", which occurs when your
expectations are violated, such as thinking you're going to a Las
Vegas family friendly Cirque Di Soleil only to realize you've
actually gotten a ticket to an all-male dance revue called
"Thunder from Down Under" (I have no idea where that example came
from). Those sorts of experiences are more strongly related to
the neurotransmitter norepinephrine.
Since the cholinergic system is most active in situations when
a person can predict that learning is possible, this makes the
system a prime candidate for the differential susceptibility
effect. As the researchers note, unpredictable and novel
environments could function as either threats or incentive
rewards. When the significance of the environment is uncertain,
both caution and exploration are adaptive. Therefore, traits
relating to anxiety or curiosity should be influenced by
cholinergic genetic variants, with developmental experiences
determining whether individuals find expected uncertainty either
more threatening or more promising.
To test their hypothesis, they focused on a polymorphism in the
CHRNABLED gene, which builds a certain kind of neural receptor
that the neurotransmitter binds to. These acetylcholine
receptors are distributed throughout the brain, and are
especially involved in the functioning of dopamine in the
striatum. Genetic differences in the CHRNABLED gene seem to
change the sensitivity of the brain's acetylcholine system
because small structural changes in these receptors make
acetylcholine binding more or less likely. Previous studies have
shown associations between variation in the CHRNABLED gene and
neuroticism as well as laboratory tests of attention and working
memory.
The researchers looked at the functioning of this gene among a
group of 614 children aged 8-13 enrolled in a week-long day camp.
Half of the children in the day camp were selected because they
had been maltreated (sexual abuse, physical abuse, neglect,
emotional maltreatment), whereas the other half was carefully
selected to come from the same socioeconomic status but not have
experienced any maltreatment. This study provides the ideal
experimental design and environmental conditions to test the
differential susceptibility effect. Not only were the
backgrounds of the children clearly defined, but also
dramatically different from each other. Additionally, all
children engaged in the same novel learning environment--an
environment well suited for cholinergic functioning. What did
they find?
Individuals with the TstT variation of the CHRNABLED gene who
were maltreated showed higher levels of anxiety (Neuroticism)
compared to those with the C allele of this gene. They appeared
to be more likely to learn anxious and fearful responses to
situations with higher levels of uncertainty. In contrast, those
with the TstT allele who were not maltreated were low in anxiety
(Neuroticism) and high in curiosity (Openness to Experience).
What's more, this effect was independent of age, race, and sex.
These results suggest that under normal parenting environments,
the TstT allele (which is much rarer in the general population
than the C allele) may be beneficial, bringing out lower levels
of anxiety and increased curiosity in response to situations
containing expected uncertainty.
These results are certainly exciting, but a few important
caveats are in order. For one thing, the TstT genotype is very
rare in the general population, which makes it all the more
important for future studies to attempt to replicate these
findings. Also, we're talking vanishingly small effects here.
The CHRNABLED variant only explained at most 1% of the variation
in neuroticism and openness to experience. So we shouldn't go
around trying to predict individual people's futures based on
knowledge of a single gene and a single environment.
Scientifically speaking though, this level of prediction is
expected based on the fact that all of our psychological
dispositions are massively polymorphic (consists of many
interacting genes). Both gene-gene and gene-environment
interactions must be taken into account. Indeed, recent research
found that the more sensitivity ("plasticity") genes relating to
the dopamine and serotonin systems adolescent males carried, the
less self-regulation they displayed under unsupportive parenting
conditions. In line with the differential susceptibility effect,
the reverse was also found: higher levels of self-regulation were
displayed by the adolescent males carrying more senstivity genes
when they were reared under supportive parenting conditions.
The findings by Grazioplene and colleagues add to a growing
literature on acetylcholine's role in the emergence of
schizophrenia and mood disorders. As the researcher's note,
these findings, while small in effect, may have clinical
implications considering childhood maltreatment is a known risk
factor for many psychiatric disorders. Children with the TstT
genotype of CHRNABLED rs1044396 may be more likely to learn
fearful responses in harsh and abusive environments, but children
with the very same genotype may be more likely to display
curiosity and engagement in response to uncertainty under normal
or supportive conditions. While it's profoundly difficult
predicting the developmental trajectory of any single individual,
this research suggests we can influence the odds that people will
retreat within themselves or unleash the fundamentally human
drive to explore and create.
More information about the acb-hsp
mailing list