[bscb-l] Response to An Open Letter to Our Customers

[Rick Morin]

I am happy to discuss this further with you offline or on the phone.
 
Regards,
 
Rick Morin
rick.morin at comcast.net
781-373-1044
 

  _____  

From: bscb-l-bounces at acb.org [mailto:bscb-l-bounces at acb.org] On Behalf Of
Frank Ventura
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 1:14 AM
To: Bay state (Massachusetts) discussion list
Subject: Re: [bscb-l] Response to An Open Letter to Our Customers



Rick, I really have to disagree with your final statement that a person that
have just as much of a right to choose to drive as to use paratransit. This
line of thinking centers around driving as a right, which it is not.

Frank

 

 

From: bscb-l-bounces at acb.org [mailto:bscb-l-bounces at acb.org] On Behalf Of
Rick Morin
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 9:28 PM
To: 'Bay state (Massachusetts) discussion list'
Subject: Re: [bscb-l] Response to An Open Letter to Our Customers

 

Frank,

Here's a scenario:

A person suffers from night blindness that prevents them from driving at
certain times of the day but not others.

This person's night blindness also prevents them from using the fixed route
system. They would be classified as conditionally eligible to use
paratransit.

You cannot not renew this person's driver's license on the basis that they
are conditionally eligible to use paratransit.  In this case, the person
would have a driver's license with a Class G (Daylight Only) restriction and
be conditionally eligible to use paratransit. It is not a given that because
you are eligible to use paratransit that you cannot drive. 

Another scenario is a person in a wheelchair that has a specially equipped
vehicle that allows them to drive. The person uses this car at certain times
but wants to use public transit to go to work. There are barriers that when
combined with the person's disability between this person's home and the bus
stop that prevents him/her from getting to the bus stop. This person is
eligible to use paratransit when these barriers are present. A person with a
disability who can drive has as much right to choose between whether they
use their car or public transit as someone who is able bodied.

 

Regards,

 

Rick Morin

rick.morin at comcast.net

781-373-1044

 

 

  _____  

From: bscb-l-bounces at acb.org [mailto:bscb-l-bounces at acb.org] On Behalf Of
Frank Ventura
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 8:49 PM
To: Bay state (Massachusetts) discussion list
Subject: Re: [bscb-l] Response to An Open Letter to Our Customers

Rick, I wasn't talking about eligibility for paratransit at all. As I said
that is defined in the ADA. What I was saying was that the RMV (Registry of
motor vehicles) need not renew a drivers license of someone who is
paratransit eligible. That is a state privledge as defined by the state
legislature. In the example I stated in my first message the rider would be
eligible for paratransit based on the ADA definition, however the
commonwealth could deny a driver's license renewal based upon that
determination. Nothing in what I said would in any way change paratransit
eligibility. Again, what I put forward was driver licensing eligibility
being based on someone not using paratransit. I think you interpreted my
message in the reverse.

Frank

 

 

From: bscb-l-bounces at acb.org [mailto:bscb-l-bounces at acb.org] On Behalf Of
Rick Morin
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 7:14 PM
To: 'Bay state (Massachusetts) discussion list'
Subject: Re: [bscb-l] Response to An Open Letter to Our Customers

 

Eligibility for complementary paratransit is strictly defined in the ADA. A
person is eligible to use complementary paratransit when 1. they have a
disability and 2. the disability prevents the person from using the fixed
route. Whether or not someone has a license is not a factor in determining
edibility for paratransit. There are cases when a person has a disability,
holds a license and is conditionally prevented from using the fixed route.
Eligibility is not an all or nothing situation. 

 

Regards,

 

Rick Morin

rick.morin at comcast.net

781-373-1044

 

 

  _____  

From: bscb-l-bounces at acb.org [mailto:bscb-l-bounces at acb.org] On Behalf Of
Frank Ventura
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 5:05 PM
To: Bay state (Massachusetts) discussion list
Subject: Re: [bscb-l] Response to An Open Letter to Our Customers

Hi all, we talk at length about some of the waste and abuse of the ride. I
was just thinking as to if paratransit eligibility could be linked to
surrendering a drivers license. This could be legally defensible since
although paratransit is a civil right concerned asdefined by the ADA a
driver's license is not. This could be similar to eligability for VR
services being linked to a central registry that makes driver's license
renewal impossible. 

Frank

Frank Ventura

frank.ventura at littlebreezes.com

 

 

 

On Mar 13, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Rick Morin wrote:

 

Hi all,

After reading Secretary Davey's Open Letter to the MBTA's customers, I felt
compelled to send the email below expressing my personal feelings.

Note the email address for Secretary Davey: Secretary.Davey at dot.state.ma.us
should you want to let the Secretary know how you feel about his Open
letter.

Rick

 

Regards,

 

Rick Morin

rick.morin at comcast.net

781-373-1044

 

 

  _____  

From: Rick Morin [mailto:rick.morin at comcast.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 6:31 PM
To: 'Secretary.Davey at dot.state.ma.us'
Subject: RE: MassDOT News Alert - An Open Letter to Our Customers

Dear Secretary Davey,

Fare hikes are necessary - let's get on with them but they must be equitable
for all.

The premise that we can no longer afford the transit system we want is
wrong. That is a planning decision -- not a knee jerk reaction to an
immediate crisis that should never have come to this point. Why has the
legislature not acted on the recommendations of the Metropolitan Area
Planning Council (MAPC) and other advisory groups? There were many solutions
that the public recommended, that, given the right time and due diligence
could avert the need for cuts. The problem is that there is not enough time.
The public process should have started a year earlier. Cutting service on
the basis that there is not enough time to study means to reduce cost and
raise revenue as proposed by the public renders the entire process we just
went through nothing but window dressing.

It is socio-economically irresponsible and unconscionable to proceed with
any service cuts in the manner in which they were studied and recommended.
Who now gets to play god and decide which services get cut and which
consumers get impacted? How do the service cut decisions get made? Your
customers have absolutely no confidence in the MBTA's ability to make these
decisions properly. Everything up to this point has been a numbers game. Why
should we believe that your recommendations will be anything other than
that?

This debacle has been known and predicted for years. The MBTA crisis needs
to be elevated to a higher statewide level and the long term solutions for
the MBTA must be part of a comprehensive structural solution for the entire
transportation system in the Commonwealth. No one knows this better than you
-- you are the Secretary of Transportation for the Commonwealth, not the
General Manager of the MBTA.

I would value the opportunity to discuss this with you in person.

Rick Morin

781-373-1044

 

 

 From: Secretary Davey (DOT) [mailto:Secretary.Davey at dot.state.ma.us] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 3:55 PM
Subject: MassDOT News Alert - An Open Letter to Our Customers

March 13, 2012

An Open Letter to Our Customers,

Over the last nine weeks we have engaged in a public process to allow our
riders to weigh in on recommendations for closing a $159 million budget gap
next year. As we conclude that process this week, we want to take a minute
to thank you for the unprecedented level of engagement you demonstrated over
this period.

Since January, nearly 6,000 of you attended our 31 public meetings, with
nearly 2,000 individuals offering public comment. In addition, we received
5,850 emails from you about the importance of the MBTA in your lives. By
comparison, the last time the MBTA raised fares in 2007 just 800 people
attended a public hearing.

The choices before us are difficult, to be sure. Hearing your individual
stories only makes them more so. We know that a quality, reliable public
transit system is essential to getting our customers to work, school,
doctor's appointments and other activities. We know a public transit option
makes our air cleaner and roads less congested. And we know that it is a
lifeline for many of you.

We have been honest about our financial problems and we thank you for your
willingness to listen. Massive debt costs, coupled with increased operating
expenses for things like energy and health care are overburdening our
system. The system we have today we cannot afford and the system we want is
well beyond reach.

Before our April 4th Board Meeting, we will lay out our final recommendation
for closing the Fiscal Year 2013 gap. We continue to work on identifying
prudent one-time revenues that will allow us to stave off some of the
proposed service cuts for one year. Our final proposal will include both
cuts and a fare increase, however.

Unfortunately, without a new dedicated revenue source, we know we will be
back in this very place next year. Many legislators attended our public
hearings, acknowledging the need for a new solution. The Governor also heard
your voices at the hearing he attended in Revere.  Our hope is that we may
continue these discussions in the coming weeks and months so that we can
collectively figure out a way to continue to provide a world-class public
transit system to you.

This is your system. Long after we're gone, customers will still have a need
and desire for a public transit option. The decisions we make today will
have a lasting impact on this system, and we thank you for remaining engaged
in this process.

Sincerely,

Richard A. Davey, Secretary and CEO

MassDOT

Jonathan Davis, Acting General Manager

MBTA


_______________________________________________________________________
This email/electronic message, including any attached files, is being sent
by the MBTA. It is solely intended for the recipient(s) and may contain
information that is proprietary, confidential, legally privileged, and/or
exempt from disclosure pursuant to state and federal law. If you have
received this message in error or are not the intended recipient(s), please
notify the sender immediately by reply, and delete all copies of this
email/electronic message and any attached files from your computer. If you
are the intended recipient(s), you may use the information contained in this
email/electronic message and any attached files only as authorized by the
MBTA. Any unauthorized use, dissemination, or disclosure of this
email/electronic message and/or its attached files is strictly prohibited.

_______________________________________________
bscb-l mailing list
bscb-l at acb.org
http://www.acb.org/mailman/listinfo/bscb-l

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.acb.org/pipermail/bscb-l/attachments/20120326/b93764e6/attachment-0001.html>